Here are some bits and pieces of articles I've read...
I'm still waiting on hearing back from some people I asked to give me their thoughts. Once I get a good view of both sides, I'll be able to better form my opinion.
Because the Obama administration is guaranteeing that Americans will only pay a set proportion of their income for private health insurance, the state will end up picking up the bill. That's hard to reconcile with the administration's assertions that the "reforms" will reduce the fiscal burden.It highlights the core problem: private insurance is a weird and deeply flawed way to provide universal healthcare coverage.- http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/22/2853179.htm?site=thedrum
The main argument for a “public option” is that it would increase competition. However, if the federal government creates a health care plan that it controls and also sets the rules for the private plans, there is little doubt that Washington would put its private sector “competitors” out of business sooner or later.
Cost or a federal health board could be the deciding factors. President Obama himself admitted this when he said, “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller,” when asked about an elderly woman who needed a pacemaker.
- http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/research/obamacare-one-pill-two-pill-red-pill-blue-pill/